1. At first I was for Ron Paul, but after researching his stand I had to change my mind. Here is why.
Two vicious enemies are waging war against America: (1) radical Islamists, and (2) atheist Humanists. These two enemies hate us with a passion, and are going to continue to attack us no matter how nice we talk to them. A neutral stand is not possible. There can be no peace as long as they have the ability to continue attacking us.
Of these two enemies the Humanists are the smartest and most organized and are doing us the most damage. They are not fighting us in a foreign country, but are in our midst. Physically, they look like us, but are traitors, practicing their sedition every day, undermining us from within. They have control of public schools, and they are the ones pushing abortion, gay-rights, same sex marriage, and atheism upon our children.
Humanism is the atheist religion that underlies communism. The foundational doctrine of humanism is evolution. Accepting evolution as ones "worldview" makes a person a humanist whether he or she realizes it or not. Humanism is a belief system based on the theory of evolution. Thinking humanists reason that if evolution is true, then everything the Bible says is wrong and must be fought. Activist humanists are highly organized under the umbrella of the International Humanists and Ethical Union (now based in England), and in the USA under the American Humanist Assocation and its front groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), National Organization of Women (NOW), Code Pink, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, National Organization of Colored People (NAACP), Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network (GLSEN), and many other news making groups.
Our next president must recognize and be willing to fight these two enemies, or else we are doomed.
2. Radical Islamists' War Against America
I have spent most of my adult life ministering to Muslims. Not all Muslims are terrorists. But most terrorists are Muslims. Those known as radical Islamists want us dead. It is impossible to reason with them. Bringing our troops home without defeating them will only make them bolder and more determined to kill us. They will never stop attacking us until we make it impossible for them to do so. Have we forgotten 9/11?
2.1 Ron Paul wants us to cut and run.
It won’t work. It will instead result in more attacks like 9/11 on our soil. It is not possible to simply stop fighting them and them go away and leave us alone. Our choices are: (1) totally defeat them; or (2) submit to Islam by turning against God's chosen people, Israel, and against God's only begotten Son, Jesus Christ. There is no other choice.
Ron Paul says that his foreign policy would be good for Israel. But Muslims and other Jew-hating groups think otherwise. Here is what one Muslim web site (MuslimsVoteRonPaul.com) has to say:
In the spin room after the Republican debate on Tuesday evening in Dearborn, Mich., a reporter from the Arab-American News asked Ron Paul what he thought of the term “Islamic fascism." “It’s a false term to make people think we’re fighting Hitler," Paul responded. “It’s war propaganda designed to generate fear so that the war has to be spread."
Why should YOU vote for Ron Paul?
Assalaamu Alaikum Brothers and Sisters,
You can help by sharing and sending this note to all the Muslims you know as well as by registering as a Republican and voting for Ron Paul in the Republican primaries in your state. Here's why: Muslims and Americans have an unique window of opportunity for the 2008 election. There is a candidate running as a Republican that would work to completely cut off the funding to Israel, remove ALL US troops from Arab lands, and repeal the Patriot Act. He's a Republican with Libertarian views named Ron Paul. Ron Paul's policies ranging from monetary to foreign are top notch. (http://muslimsvoteronpaul.com/)
Humm, that link seems to be dead now, but it took just a few minutes to find another one: The Muslim Observer And here is yet another one: muslims_for_ron_paul. Want to see even more? Do a web search.
The American Humanist Association (AHA) is very much like the Communist Party. In fact, in beliefs and goals humanism is virtually identical with communism. The AHA differs from communists mainly in method. While the communists advocate the use of brute force, the Humanists rely on deception in education to win at the ballot box. By persuading people to believe atheist ideas, Humanists cause people to willingly vote away their freedoms. Sodomy is one of their main tools in this war of ideas.
3.1 Multiplied Thousands of Children Are Being Seduced Into Sodomy by Humanists
For over 22 years the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been working quietly with the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network (GLSEN) to establish Gay/Straight Alliances (GSA) clubs in public schools all across America (go to their website yourself to read a short history of this Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender & AIDS Project). They have been unbelievably successful. They have convinced hundreds of thousands of children that they were born gay, and have sucked them into sodomy. In February of 2005, Time magazine reported:
Kids are disclosing their homosexuality with unprecedented regularity--and they are doing so much younger. The average gay person now comes out just before or after graduating high school, according to The New Gay Teenager, a book Harvard University Press published this summer. The book quotes a Penn State study of 350 young people from 59 gay groups that found that the mean age at which lesbians first have sexual contact with other girls is 16; it's just 14 for gay boys. In 1997 there were approximately 100 gay-straight alliances (GSAs)--clubs for gay and gay-friendly kids--on U.S. high school campuses. Today there are at least 3,000 GSAs--nearly 1 in 10 high schools has one--according to the Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network (GLSEN, say "glisten"), which registers and advises GSAs. In the 2004-05 academic year, GSAs were established at U.S. schools at the rate of three per day.
The appearance of so many gay adolescents has, predictably, worried social conservatives, but it has also surprised gay activists, who for years did little to help the few teenagers who were coming out. Both sides sense high stakes. "Same-sex marriage--that's out there. But something going on in a more fierce and insidious way, under the radar, is what's happening in our schools," says Mathew Staver, president of Liberty Counsel, an influential conservative litigation group that earlier this year won a court order blocking a Montgomery County, Md., teachers' guide that disparaged Evangelicals for their views on gays. "They"--gay activists--"know if they make enough inroads into [schools], the same-sex-marriage battle will be moot." (The Battle Over Gay Teens).
That was written three years ago so, at the rate of 3 new GSA clubs established each day, we can do a little math.
3 GSA clubs per day x 365 days per year x 3 years = 3,285 new GSA clubs since the above quotes was written. Add to that the 3,000 GSA clubs that already existed when that paragraph was written, and you have 6,285 GSA clubs seducing children into sodomy. And actually the number is probably far greater than that, because these GSA clubs are not just making children into sodomites, but also into gay activists. They are not "adding" to their number but "multiplying" their numbers.
This horrific seduction of American children into sodomy must be stopped soon or we are doomed! Why? Because
3.2 Child Sodomites grow up to become Radical Atheistist Democrat Voters and Humanist Activists
Children who get hooked on sodomy generally turn against their parents and against God. When they get old enough to vote, they vote anti-morals, anti-Christian, and anti-God. And sodomites make formidable political activists because, having no spouse or children, they have lots of time and money to spend on their political agendas. Therefore,
3.3 Left Alone the Gay-Rights Movement Will Destroy America
Same-Sex Marriage Will Be Legalized For Certain
Support For Heterosexual Marriage Will End Totally
So-called "Hate Crimes" laws will pass, making it illegal to criticize homosexual behavior---thus ending freedom of speech for anyone using the Bible to show what God says about sodomy. Go to the Library of Congress THOMAS website and type in “hate crimes" and you will see that there are presently 25 bills before Congress containing that exact phrase. If these bills are passed into law, then our freedom is gone.
Atheism Will Prevail In America, as some of these bills also protect atheists from being critized.
Considering the above facts, it is easy to see that the sodomite agenda is very far advanced. Our children are in grave danger, the institiution of the home is in grave danger, and our freedom of speech and religion is in grave danger. Therefore,
3.4 A President Who Compromises On Sodomy Would Be Our End
3.5 Ron Paul believes that homosexuals are born that way and that homosexuality is not a sin.
The American View interviewed Ron Paul and asked him,
Is homosexuality a sin? Paul says he’s “not as judgmental about that probably because of my medical background. I don’t see it in [such] simplistic terms. I think it’s a complex issue to think it’s a sin or other problems with the way people are born. It’s too complex to give an answer as simple as that [that homosexuality is a sin.]"
Does he believe God says homosexuality is a sin? “Well, I believe a lot of people understand it that way but I think everybody is God’s child, too, so, you know, I have trouble with that."
So, Ron Paul has trouble accepting what the Bible says about sodomy being a sin. He doesn’t think homosexuality is sin. He thinks that people are “born" that way. Wow! Just examining his web site one would expect the opposite.
A web search found this conversation on the web site of a homosexual named Brian:
Dear Ron Paul,
As a gay man, I would really like to see you take a strong stance on gay rights as you have done with the war and immigration. I read that you are a libertarian and when I googled that term this is what I found:
Libertarianism is a political philosophy maintaining that all persons are the absolute owners of their own lives, and should be free to do whatever they wish with their persons or property, provided they allow others the same liberty and avoid abusing their liberty.
How can you NOT support gay rights and equality if you truly believe the above statement?
Response from Ron Paul's campaign headquarters:
Dr. Paul voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment, one of only a few Republicans to do so.
Thanks for contacting us,
Ron Paul 2008
This seems to be implying that Ron Paul is for gay rights. I sent an e-mail to the Ron Paul campaign asking for clarification on this issue. They answered:
In a recent interview, Dr. Paul had this to say on the issue of gay rights: "I don't see rights as gay rights, women's rights, minority rights. I see only one kind of rights: the individual's. The individual has a right to their life and their liberty, and everyone should be treated equally."
This is just riding the fence, trying to get voters from both sides. The issue is not whether gays have the same rights as other individuals, but rather do any individuals have the right to commit sodomy, and do individuals committing sodomy have a right no other sinners have, that is, the right to be protected by the government from criticism of their wicked behavior. Rapists are individuals also; do they have such a right? No. Robbers are individuals also. Do they have such a right? No. Murderers are individuals also, do they have such a right? No.
3.5 Ron Paul's Misuse of States Rights Will Result In the Loss of Civil Rights
I strongly believe in states rights. But states rights does not mean exempting special groups from basic morality. Morality is the foundation of civil rights. For instance, if stealing is allowed, then the right to own property does not exist. If murder is allowed, then the right to life does not exist. If rape and sodomy are allowed, the right to live a happy life and raise a godly family does not exist.
On the issue of gay-marriage Paul abuses states rights. He says,
Mr. Speaker, while I oppose federal efforts to redefine marriage as something other than a union between one man and one woman, I do not believe a constitutional amendment is either a necessary or proper way to defend marriage.…
If I were in Congress in 1996, I would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which used Congress’s constitutional authority to define what official state documents other states have to recognize under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, to ensure that no state would be forced to recognize a “same sex" marriage license issued in another state. This Congress, I was an original cosponsor of the Marriage Protection Act, HR 3313, that removes challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act from federal courts’ jurisdiction. If I were a member of the Texas legislature, I would do all I could to oppose any attempt by rogue judges to impose a new definition of marriage on the people of my state. (Ron Paul on Same-sex Marriage).
In other words, Paul believes that this is an issue that should be decided by the States. As president, he would do nothing about this problem, except pass it off to the governors. That is wrong! Should a state allow certain classes of people to practice slavery if enough people in that state want it? Should whites in Texas be allowed to enslave blacks or Asians or Hispanics who live in or visit that state? No! Non-moral issues are decided by the states, but moral issues must be decided at the federal level. Sodomy is a very basic moral problem like murder or rape or slavery. A state cannot be allowed to make rape, or murder, or slavery, or sodomy legal in their state.
Sodomy is a major issue facing the next president. Ron Paul either hasn’t thought this issue out well (in which case he should not be president), or else he is on the sodomite’s side (in which case he should not be president).
3.6 Ron Paul believes in evolution thus rejecting the Bible
I sent the following question in an e-mail to Paul’s campaign headquarters:
"Does Dr. Paul believe in evolution? This is my second e-mail asking this question. I'm assuming that the answer is yes, since he didn't raise his hand in the debate when it was asked who does not believe in evolution."
"Congressman Paul believes in evolution."
So, we have it straight from his headquarters—Ron Paul does believe in evolution. This means he does not believe the very first chapter of the Bible, and therefore probably doubts the truthfulness of the rest of the Bible also. That is why he refuses to accept what Bible verses such as Lev. 18:22; 20:13; and Romans 1:26-27) say about sodomy; he just doesn’t really believe the Bible is true. Believing evolution makes him a practical humanist, and that means that he will make many decisions based on that very wrong world-view. All such decisions will be wrong.
3.7 Mike Huckabee opposes gay rights, gay marriage, and does not believe in evolution.
Huckabee's motto is "Faith, Family, Freedom." Here is what he says about gay marriage:
I support and have always supported passage of a federal constitutional amendment that defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman. As President, I will fight for passage of this amendment. My personal belief is that marriage is between one man and one woman, for life.
No other candidate has supported traditional marriage more consistently and steadfastly than I have. While Massachusetts was allowing homosexuals to marry, I got a constitutional amendment passed in Arkansas in 2002 defining marriage as between one man and one woman. I got Arkansas to become only the third state to adopt "covenant" marriage. My wife Janet and I upgraded our vows on Valentine's Day, 2005. Today, many churches in Arkansas will perform only covenant marriages, so I'm hoping we'll see a decline in our divorce rates.
The late Cardinal O'Connor decried a domestic partnership law (which provided that all couples who signed up, whether heterosexual or homosexual, would be treated the same as married couples) as legislating that "marriage doesn't matter." I agree with the Cardinal that marriage does matter, I would add that nothing in our society matters more. Our true strength doesn't come from our military or our gross national product, it comes from our families. What's the point of keeping the terrorists at bay in the Middle East if we can't keep decline and decadence at bay here at home? (www.mikehuckabee.com) [Emphasis added.]
4. The Fair Tax Is Another Reason I Support Mike Huckabee
Mike Huckabee has been accused of being weak on fiscal conservatism. I strongly disagree. Without any shadow of doubt, his Fair Tax plan would make the US economy skyrocket. If you don't understand how the Fair Tax works go here (be sure to watch the debate video at the top of the page showing the McCain-Huckabee exchange):
Also, be sure to use the Fair Tax Calculator to figure out how fair the Fair Tax would be to you: The Fair Tax Calculator
5. Conclusion: Mike Huckabee is the only chance we have for a truly conservative president
After examining the past and presents stands of all the candidates, and then comparing them with what the Bible teaches, it is my conclusion that Mike Huckabee is the only candidate in agreement with God on the major issues presently facing America: Islamist terrorism, the future of Israel, special rights for sodomites, and sodomite "marriage."